Legal Opinion

Bank of Woodland v. Heron

California Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1898No. Sac. No. 394PublishedCited by 18 opinions

• APPEAL from á judgment of the Superior 'Court of Yolo County. W. H. Grant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment. David Heron executed to the plaintiff hank his promissory note for nine thousand dollars, secured hy mortgage' upon realty. Afterward he conveyed the land affected by the mortgage to Sophia Heron, his wife. The bank brought this action to foreclose the mortgage. By verified complaint it pleaded its execution, acknowledgment, and certification so as to entitle it to recordation, and alleged that it was forthwith recorded in the records of Yolo county. The verified answer and cross-complaint of defendants admitted all of these allegations, but averred…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Cooke v. SpearsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Shadburne v. DalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. County of Siskiyou v. GamlichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Roemer v. Retail Credit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Rudd v. ByrnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Wells, Fargo & Co. v. EnrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Tognazzi v. WilhelmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Brown v. AguilarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API