Legal Opinion
Speros v. Yu
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 3, 2004No. 1 CA-CV 02-0736PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRVINE, Judge.
¶ 1 James Speros appeals the trial court’s summary judgment awarding a portion of an alley known as the “South Alley” to Kristine Yu. 1 We hold that the trial court correctly found that the South Alley was not “the exterior boundary of a subdivision or other tract of land,” so title to the abandoned alley was properly divided between the owners of the abutting lands. Therefore, we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 This action arises out of a dispute regarding the South Alley, which separates Speros’s and Yu’s lots within the Hood Homes Subdivision. The Hood Homes…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Phoenix v. YatesArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Republic Investment Fund I v. Town of SurpriseArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Files v. BernalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- State v. Superior Court for Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Gila River Indian Community v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- State of Arizona v. Aaron Raymond FikesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Gila River Indian Community v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.