Legal Opinion

Files v. Bernal

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 24, 2001No. 2 CA-CV 99-0215PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DRUKE, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellee Steven Files approached an undercover police officer who was posing as a prostitute and offered her “at least $40.00” if she would have “ ‘straight sex’” with him. Files was charged with violating Tucson City Code § 11 — 28(l)(c), which criminalizes the conduct of anyone who “[a]ids, offers or agrees to commit or conspires to commit or commits any act of prostitution.” After the city court denied his motion to dismiss, Files brought a special action in the superior court, which granted relief and instructed the city court to dismiss the charge. This appeal by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Bilagody v. ThorneycroftCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  3. Torres v. North American Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. State v. DiGiulioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  5. Whiteco Outdoor Advertising v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Yarbrough v. Montoya-PaezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  3. Merlina v. JejnaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. Stapert v. Arizona Board of Psychologist ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. Empress Adult Video & Bookstore v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API