Files v. Bernal
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DRUKE, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellee Steven Files approached an undercover police officer who was posing as a prostitute and offered her “at least $40.00” if she would have “ ‘straight sex’” with him. Files was charged with violating Tucson City Code § 11 — 28(l)(c), which criminalizes the conduct of anyone who “[a]ids, offers or agrees to commit or conspires to commit or commits any act of prostitution.” After the city court denied his motion to dismiss, Files brought a special action in the superior court, which granted relief and instructed the city court to dismiss the charge. This appeal by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Bilagody v. ThorneycroftCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Torres v. North American Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- State v. DiGiulioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Whiteco Outdoor Advertising v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Yarbrough v. Montoya-PaezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Merlina v. JejnaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Stapert v. Arizona Board of Psychologist ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Empress Adult Video & Bookstore v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.