State v. Superior Court for Maricopa County
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.
Petitioners, by this special action, seek relief from a summary judgment of the Superior Court of Maricopa County which held that respondent Kerr-McGee Corpora tion’s oil and gas leases were not subject to the ad valorem property tax imposed by A.R.S. § 42-227.04. We accepted jurisdiction pursuant to the authority of Article 6, § 5, Constitution of Arizona, which provides that the Supreme Court of Arizona has power to issue writs of review.
The facts are undisputed. Respondent Kerr-McGee is the lessee under certain gas and oil leases with the Navajo Indian…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
- Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
- Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
- Calcote v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- Duhame v. State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Devenir Associates v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. TarangoArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Mejak v. GranvilleArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Humana Hospital Desert Valley v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.