Legal Opinion
Even-Cut Abrasive Band & Equipment Corp. v. Cleveland Container Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 17, 1949No. 10593PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Chief Judge.
The Cleveland Container Company (herein called Container) brought suit under Sec. 400 [now §§ 2201, 2202] of Title 28 U.S. C.A., against Even-Cut Abrasive Band and Equipment Corporation (herein called Even-Cut), assignee-owner of Reissue Patent No. 20,817 — 4938, to Maddox, seeking a declaratory judgment that the reissue was invalid. The complaint also sought to enjoin Even-Cut from making charges that the plaintiff infringed the reissue. The complaint further alleged that Container had a license under the patent through intervening rights, and that Homer Coe, the Manager…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States Gypsum Co. v. Consolidated Expanded Metal CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- General Metals Powder Co. v. S. K. Wellman Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
- French Renovating Co. v. Ray Renovating Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- Hug v. Lakewood Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
- Ohio Galvanizing & Mfg. Co. v. Mercury Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blackburn v. City of ColumbusDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1973
- Kenny v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1954
- Vernay Laboratories, Inc. v. Industrial Electronic Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- Sterling Aluminum Products, Inc. v. Bohn Aluminum & Brass Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1960
- Turchan v. Cincinnati Milling MacHine Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.