Legal Opinion

Vernay Laboratories, Inc. v. Industrial Electronic Rubber Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 15, 1964No. Civ. A. C 64-207PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALBFLEISCH, District Judge.

Defendant’s request for an oral hearing on its motion for summary judgment will be denied since the Court can dispose of the questions presented without need of an oral hearing.

Defendant has moved for a summary judgment based upon the claim that patent No. 3,090,108, the patent which plaintiff charges defendant has infringed, is void and unenforceable.

In examining defendant’s claim for summary judgment the Court is mindful of the fact there can be an issue over interpretation of known facts. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in S. J. Groves & Sons Co. v. Ohio…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. S. J. Groves & Sons Company v. Ohio Turnpike CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  3. Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. U. S. Industrial Chemicals, Inc. v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Berssenbrugge v. Luce Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Keith v. VolpeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Smith, Kline & French Laboratories v. A. H. Robins Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. In re AltenpohlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  4. Johnston v. Textron, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1984
  5. Barks v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API