Legal Opinion

Hug v. Lakewood Engineering Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 30, 1925No. 4188PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEB CUBIAM.

Infringement suit based on patent No. 1,421,237, issued to appellant June 27, 1922, on a subgrading machine. Claim 1 is quoted in the margin. Judge Westenhaver thoroughly considered the patent in connection with the prior art, and held that it was invalid for lack of invention. With this conclusion we agree. So much of his opinion as relates to that subject we adopt, as follows:

“Defendant is and has been since 1918, making a similar subgrading machine under United States letters patent No. 1,268,925, issued to É. G. Carr, June 11, 1918, on application filed March 7, 1917. In the…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Victor Cooler Door Co. v. Jamison Cold Storage Door Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  2. Aluminum Co. of America v. Sperry Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  3. Monarch Marking System Co. v. Dennison Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  4. Byrne Mfg. Co. v. American Flange & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  5. Condit v. Jackson Corset Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API