Hug v. Lakewood Engineering Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PEB CUBIAM.
Infringement suit based on patent No. 1,421,237, issued to appellant June 27, 1922, on a subgrading machine. Claim 1 is quoted in the margin. Judge Westenhaver thoroughly considered the patent in connection with the prior art, and held that it was invalid for lack of invention. With this conclusion we agree. So much of his opinion as relates to that subject we adopt, as follows:
“Defendant is and has been since 1918, making a similar subgrading machine under United States letters patent No. 1,268,925, issued to É. G. Carr, June 11, 1918, on application filed March 7, 1917. In the…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Victor Cooler Door Co. v. Jamison Cold Storage Door Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Sperry Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Monarch Marking System Co. v. Dennison Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- Byrne Mfg. Co. v. American Flange & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- Condit v. Jackson Corset Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.