Legal Opinion

French Renovating Co. v. Ray Renovating Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 1, 1948No. 10659PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff, The French Renovating Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Ohio, with its principal office in Cleveland, filed its complaint against the defendant, The Ray Renovating Company, also a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Ohio, with its principal office and place of business in that State, and against Albert B. Beitman, a resident of Cleveland Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio. The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendants as they appeared in the court below.

The complaint alleged four separate causes of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. General Motors Corporation v. Rubsam CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Harry A. Pursche v. Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation, Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation v. Harry A. PurscheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Sol A. Dann, John H. Neville and Louise A. Turek v. Studebaker-Packard Corporation, Harold E. Churchill, Hugh J. Ferry, and A. J. PortaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  3. Powder Power Tool Corporation v. Powder Actuated Tool Company, Inc., and Frank J. KlunkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  4. Landstrom v. ThorpeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  5. Rumbaugh v. Winifrede Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API