Legal Opinion

Ohio Galvanizing & Mfg. Co. v. Mercury Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 11, 1931No. 5558PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Infringement suit based upon reissue patent No. 16,157, granted to Hinshaw, September 1, 1925, for a trailer truck and assigned to appellee. Claims 2, 5, 7, 8, and 10 are in issue. Claims 2 and 8 are printed in the margin.1 The defenses were: (1) That all claims are invalid; (2) that claim 10, if valid, is not infringed; (3) that the reissue patent is not supported by claims patentably different from those in the original application; and (4) that appellee is estopped to assert claims 2, 5, 7, and 8 against appellant. The District Judge held all claims valid and infringed.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Railroad Supply Co. v. Elyria Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Adams v. Galion Iron Works & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  3. Hug v. Lakewood Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ranco, Inc. v. GwynnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  2. McNally v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. United States v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  4. Even-Cut Abrasive Band & Equipment Corp. v. Cleveland Container Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
  5. Stockham Pipe & Fittings Co. v. Ohio Steel Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API