Legal Opinion
Turchan v. Cincinnati Milling MacHine Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 24, 1953No. 11679PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Chief Judge.
This is a companion case to Cincinnati Milling Machine Company v. Turchan, 6 Cir., 208 F.2d 222. It is here on a separate appeal supported by separate briefs and was separately argued. The appellant seeks to reverse an order denying appellant attorney fees incurred in the preparation of defenses to patents and claims withdrawn by the appellee from its patent infringement suit, both before and during trial.
By its complaint in No. 11,716, filed September 12, 1946, the appellee charged infringement of seven patents, namely, Anderson, three patents to Wall, and one each to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Park-In-Theatres, Inc. v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Dubil v. Rayford Camp & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Photochart Photo Patrol, Inc. v. Photo Patrol, Inc. PhotochartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- American Chain & Cable Co., Inc. v. Rochester Ropes, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
- Cincinnati Milling MacHine Co. v. TurchanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Livesay Window Company, Inc. v. Livesay Industries, Inc., and Everett G. Livesay Window Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Uniflow Manufacturing Co. And Jefferson Ice Company v. King-Seeley Thermos Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Robert A. Collins and Pigloo Corporation, an Iowa Corporation v. Foster OwenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Clinton Engines Corp. v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1959
- Rainworks Ltd. v. Mill-Rose Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.