Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Fiorella v. Baltimore & O. R.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 6, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 10003PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARD, District Judge.

This is an action by a Pennsylvania citizen against the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company (hereinafter called B&O,) a Maryland corporation, and the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company (hereinafter called CMSP&P), a Wisconsin corporation. It is now before me on the CMSP&P’s motion to quash the service of sumnjons on it and to dismiss the complaint as to it.

The plaintiff, while unloading a railroad car in the Philadelphia Navy Yard on August 13, 1947, was injured when he was struck on the head by a door lock which fell off the car door. This railroad…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hayman v. Southern Pacific CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Kenny v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1955
  3. Hershel Radio Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Kulicke v. Rollway Bearing CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Moore v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API