Kenny v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, District Judge.
This case presents the recurring problem of solicitation as “doing business.” We plowed the solicitation field in Perkins v. Louisville & N. R. Co., D.C. Cal.1951, 94 F.Supp. 946, and in deciding that the foreign corporation was doing business in California and subj'ect to the jurisdiction of a federal court, we held state law was controlling as to what constitutes “doing business.” But that case was a diversity case, removed from the state court. On removal of a diversity case to a federal court, unless the state court had jurisdiction over the defendant, none…
2Cases cited104 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Fisher Governor Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Mr. And Mrs. A. T. Stanga v. McCormick Shipping CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Henry R. Jahn & Son, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Mateo CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Archibald v. Cinerama HotelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.