Legal Opinion

Wong v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1966No. Civ. 30701PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHANTRY, J. pro tem. *

This is a request by petitioner after judgment for a writ of prohibition preventing said respondent superior court from enforcing that portion of its interlocutory judgment ordering forthwith payment of attorney fees to the petitioner’s former attorney, Fred K. Wong, from the community property in petitioner’s possession.

Petitioner, Norman W. Wong, is the plaintiff and cross-defendant in a divorce action. He was represented in said action by Attorney Fred K. Wong, real party in interest. The court received testimony as to the value of the services performed for the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. McKannay v. McKannayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Mudd v. MuddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. In Re WrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Overell v. OverellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In Re Marriage of JafemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Bronco Wine Co. v. Frank A. Logoluso FarmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Fazzi v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Jones v. TysonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API