Legal Opinion

Mudd v. Mudd

California Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1893No. 18081PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Glenn County, granting alimony and counsel fees. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The appellant brought this action for a divorce from the defendant, and, on the 19th of March, 1892, after the defendant had appeared in the action, but before she had answered the complaint, she made an application to the court for an order directing the appellant to pay to her temporary alimony pending the suit, and also a certain amount of money, “as counsel fees and court costs.” The court thereupon made an order directing the appellant to appear before it on the twenty-second day of March and show cause why the defendant’s application should not be granted. On that day the plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Turner v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kenney v. KenneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Hall v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Tremper v. TremperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Sweeley v. SweeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Loeb v. LoebCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API