Legal Opinion

Bronco Wine Co. v. Frank A. Logoluso Farms

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 1989No. Docket Nos. F008722, F009410PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, Acting P. J.

Facts and Proceedings Below

Bronco Wine Company (hereafter Bronco) operates wineries in Fresno and Ceres and processes grapes into wine for sale in bulk to other vintners. The operations of Frank A. Logoluso Farms (hereafter Logoluso) include farming Thompson seedless and French Colombard wine grapes.

In June of 1982, Bronco and Logoluso entered into two ten-year contracts for Bronco’s purchase of Logoluso’s Thompson seedless and French Colombard grapes. The contracts expressly provide that the grapes’ sugar content or “balling” would be calculated separately for each…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Twining v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  5. People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. South Bay Chevrolet v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Linear Technology Corp. v. Applied Materials, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Wilner v. Sunset Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API