Legal Opinion

Overell v. Overell

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1937No. Civ. S. C. 46PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHINN, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to certain real and personal property. Defendant Madelene M. Overell filed a cross-complaint to quiet title, which plaintiff answered. Upon the issues thus raised the action was tried and by its judgment the court quieted plaintiff’s title to some of the property involved, both real and personal, and solely because plaintiff consented thereto, decreed that defendant Madelene M. Overell should receive from plaintiff certain other property, real and personal, and further decreed that one parcel of land was held in joint tenancy by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baar v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Pennell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Bachman v. SepulvedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Bowman v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Bronco Wine Co. v. Frank A. Logoluso FarmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Fazzi v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Brucks v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API