Legal Opinion

Kester v. Colonial Manor of Custer

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1997No. NonePublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] In this appeal, Colonial Manor and its workers’ compensation insurer, The Travelers (hereinafter collectively referred to as Colonial Manor), assert that the South Dakota Department of Labor and the circuit court erred in finding that Margie Kester’s present condition is causally connected to a work-related injury she suffered while working for Colonial Manor. Colonial Manor also asserts that the circuit court erred in reversing Department’s decision denying permanent total disability benefits to Kester under the odd-lot doctrine. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶2.] Kester began…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Day v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Egemo v. FloresSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Lawler v. Windmill RestaurantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Hanson v. Penrod Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Albertson'sSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Kurtz v. SCISouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Leigh v. Seekins FordAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. BostonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Goebel v. Warner TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API