Legal Opinion

Kurtz v. SCI

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1998No. NonePublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Workers’ compensation self-insured employer appeals circuit court’s ruling that claimant is entitled to permanent total disability benefits under the odd-lot doctrine. Employer claims the court erred in adopting the administrative law judge’s findings of fact and conclusions of law because they were rejected by the Director of the Department of Labor. We affirm.

PACTS

[¶ 2.] Joyce Kurtz was employed as a computer board assembler by SCI (Employer) for approximately seven months. She worked in the same capacity for Employer’s predecessor for about four years. On May 2,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Mash v. CutlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Century 21 Associated Realty v. HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Insurance Agents, Inc. v. ZimmermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Shepherd v. Moorman ManufacturingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Brown v. Douglas School DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Watertown Coop. Elevator Ass'n v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Goebel v. Warner TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Capital Motors, LLC v. SchiedSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. WATERTOWN COOP. ELEVATOR v. Dept. of Rev.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API