Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Penrod Construction Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1988No. 15905PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

Employer, Penrod Construction Company (Company) appeals from an order of the circuit court which affirmed an order and award entered against Company and Iowa Mutual Insurance Company (Insurer) by the South Dakota Department of Labor, Division of Labor and Management (Department). We affirm in part, reverse and remand in part.

James D. Hanson (Hanson or claimant) was working as a superintendent/construc*397tion worker for Company on August 24, 1978. While exiting from a Bobcat loader Hanson slipped, but landed in an upright position. Hanson did not feel any immediate severe pain at…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Schulte v. CH PETERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. King v. Johnson Bros. Construction CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Wright v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Central South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Barkdull v. Homestake Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Petersen v. Hinky DinkySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wagaman v. Sioux Falls ConstructionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cozine v. Midwest Coast Transport, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Hendrix v. Graham Tire Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API