Legal Opinion
Goebel v. Warner Transportation
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 14, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbertson, Justice
[¶ 1.] Eugene Goebel (Goebel) appeals the circuit court’s order denying his claim for worker’s compensation benefits. The Department of Labor (Department) and the circuit court found Warner Transportation (Warner) had met its burden of proving SDCL 62-4-37 barred Goebel’s claim. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶ 2.] On June 12,1993, Goebel left Sioux Falls, South Dakota, to drive a semi-truck for his employer, Warner, to Salinas, California, where he arrived on June 15. After completing his duties in Salinas, Goebel was off-duty for approximately ten hours. He and some other drivers obtained a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Lahey v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- The People v. McCabeIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- Richard W. Spence v. Hal FarrierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Brown v. Douglas School DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Wells v. Howe Heating & Plumbing, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Holscher v. Valley Queen Cheese FactorySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Arends v. Dacotah CementSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Sandner v. Minnehaha CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.