Leigh v. Seekins Ford
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
After injuring his back while employed by Seekins Ford, Mark Leigh unsuccessfully claimed permanent total disability (PTD) benefits under the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Act. He argues on appeal that Seekins Ford did not rebut the presumption of com-pensability that, he claims, arose from evidence that debilitating pain and pain medication kept him from working and rendered futile efforts to find suitable employment. We conclude that the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board did not make sufficient findings addressing Leigh’s evidence that he was…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lyons v. Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Miller v. ITT Arctic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- L.G. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Veco, Inc. v. WolferAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Air America, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, and Joseph F. KerchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Button v. Haines BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Pyramid Printing Co. v. Alaska State Commission for Human RightsAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- South Anchorage Concerned Coalition, Inc. v. Municipality of Anchorage Board of AdjustmentAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Pietro v. Unocal Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Gregory Weaver v. ASRC Federal Holding Co. and Arctic Slope Regional Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2020
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.