Lincoln Place Tenants Ass'n v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, Acting P. J.
In this matter involving a redevelopment project in the Venice Beach area of Los Angeles we hold the city cannot disregard the mitigating conditions it placed on the demolition of the buildings without conducting a supplemental California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review; the city cannot simply declare the demolition a “different project.” We also hold the original environmental impact report (EIR) for the project was not insufficient for failure adequately to consider the historical importance of the structures slated for demolition.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Federation of Hillside & Canyon Associations v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Plan for Arcadia, Inc. v. City Council of ArcadiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Federation of Hillside & Canyon Assn's v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- L.A Lincoln Place Invr's, LTD. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Marlin v. AIMCO VENEZIA, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Lincoln Place Tenants Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Abatti v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Doe v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Moss v. County of HumboldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.