Legal Opinion
Federation of Hillside & Canyon Assn's v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 28, 2000No. B126659PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, Acting P. J.
—Federation of Hillside and Canyon Associations (FHCA), a homeowners advocacy group, and Coalition Against the Pipeline (CAP), an environmental advocacy group (collectively, Petitioners), challenged the certification by City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles City Council (collectively, the city) of an environmental impact report (EIR) concerning an amendment to the city’s general plan. They maintained that the EIR was deficient, that there was no substantial evidence to support the city’s findings, and that the city had failed to recirculate the draft EIR upon the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Lesher Communications, Inc. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Gentry v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Federation of Hillside & Canyon Associations v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.