Legal Opinion

Doe v. Brown

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 3, 2009No. D053982PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AARON, J.

I

INTRODUCTION

Pursuant to Penal Code section 1203.4, 1 a person who commits an offense and who subsequently fulfills all of the conditions of a grant of probation is generally entitled to be released from “all penalties and disabilities” resulting from that offense under the circumstances specified in that section. However, pursuant to section 290.007, “Any person required to register pursuant to any provision of the [Sex Offender Registration Act (§ 290 et seq.)] shall register in accordance with the [Sex Offender Registration Act], regardless of whether the person’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whaley v. Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Manhattan Loft, LLC v. Mercury Liquors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. People v. ArataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Lincoln Place Tenants Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Realmuto v. GagnardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. MKJA Inc. v. 123 Fit Franchising, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Yu v. University of La VerneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. City of Dana Point v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Yohner v. California Department of JusticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API