Legal Opinion
Plan for Arcadia, Inc. v. City Council of Arcadia
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 1974No. Civ. 42560PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COLE, J. *
Plan for Arcadia, Inc., and Carl J. Williams (hereinafter “petitioners”) unsuccessfully sought a writ of mandamus directed to the City Council of the City of Arcadia (hereinafter “City Council”). Anita Associates, a limited partnership, and Santa Anita Consolidated, Inc., a corporation, were named as real parties in interest (hereinafter “Santa Anita” collectively and “Anita Associates” or “Consolidated” when referred to separately). Petitioners appeal.
The questions raised on this appeal involve the Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (hereinafter “E.Q.A.”) Public Resources…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- County of Inyo v. YortyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- County of Inyo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Friends Of" B" Street v. City of HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Santiago County Water District v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. Main San Gabriel Basin WatermasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- San Francisco Ecology Center v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.