Legal Opinion
Federation of Hillside & Canyon Associations v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 10, 2004No. B166819PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, Acting P. J.
Federation of Hillside and Canyon Associations and Coalition Against the Pipeline (collectively Petitioners) appeal the denial of their petition for writ of mandate against City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles City Council (collectively the city). Petitioners challenged the city’s approval of a revised “General Plan Framework” and the city’s findings and statement of overriding considerations under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) in connection with that approval. We conclude that Petitioners have not shown error…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Patrowicz v. Transamerica HomeFirst, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Villacres v. Abm Industries Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- MHC Financing Ltd. Partnership v. City of San RafaelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Friends of Lagoon Valley v. City of VacavilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.