Legal Opinion

Perlmutter v. Standard Roofing & Tinsmith Supply Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1964PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. Paul Kane, J.

Defendant Standard, a foreign corporation, moves to dismiss the complaint in this action upon the grounds of lack of jurisdiction of the person of the defendant (CPLR 3211, subd. [a], par. 8).

The moving papers indicate the action is for breach of contract or breach of warranty. It appears the cause of action arose as a result of plaintiffs ordering trafile tile and related materials in May and June, 1959, with a concern known as Selling for Manufacturers, Inc., a New Jersey corporation. The orders were by telephone to Selling who thereafter placed the orders with Standard, the wholesale…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kleinfeld v. LinkOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. American Compressed Steel Corp. v. Pettibone Mulliken Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1967
  3. General Leisure Products Corp. v. Gleason CorporationDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1971
  4. Schroeder v. LoomisNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Elkan v. Clyde L. Hindman Agency, Inc.Nassau County District Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API