Legal Opinion
American Compressed Steel Corp. v. Pettibone Mulliken Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided April 21, 1967No. 6277PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOGAN, District Judge.
The plaintiff, American Compressed Steel Corporation, a New Jersey corporation with its principal place of business in Cincinnati (American), filed a complaint against the defendants, Pettibone Mulliken Corporation, a Delaware corporation having its principal place of business in Chicago, Illinois (Pettibone), and Hammermills, Inc., a Missouri corporation having its principal place of business in Iowa (Hammermills). Neither of the defendants has a place of business in Ohio; neither defendant is “doing business” in Ohio in the generally accepted sense of that term.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Erl Anger Mills, Inc. v. Cohoes Fibre Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- John G. Kolbe, Inc. v. Chromodern Chair Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1971
- Wisconsin Electrical Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Pennant Products, Inc., and County of Monroe Industrial Development AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Edward J. Moriarty & Co. v. General Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1967
- Bagsarian v. Parker Metal CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1968
- Graham Engineering Corp. v. Kemp Products Ltd.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.