Legal Opinion
Elkan v. Clyde L. Hindman Agency, Inc.
Nassau County District Court
Decided May 13, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBernard Tomson, J.
The defendant, Clyde L. Hindman Agency, Inc., moves pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 8) to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the court has no jurisdiction over it.
The plaintiff, a Nassau resident, instituted this action against the Hindman Agency, a foreign corporation not licensed to do business in New York, with its principal place of business in *404California, and the Underwriters Insurance Co., which the plaintiff alleges is licensed to ‘ ‘ transact the business of insurance in the State of New York.”
The Hindman Agency solicited the plaintiff’s insurance business conditioned…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Iroquois Gas Corp. v. CollinsNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Steele v. De LeeuwNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Irgang v. Pelton & Crane Co.New York Supreme Court · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Engelhardt v. Shields & Co.Nassau County District Court · 1966
- La Rosa v. LevineNassau County District Court · 1965
- Ambassador Insurance v. Truly Nolan of America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- City of New York v. Continental Vitamin Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966