Legal Opinion
Kleinfeld v. Link
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 22, 1983No. 1-82-31PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Lima Municipal Court in favor of the plaintiff-appellee, Andrew J. Kleinfeld, which granted full faith and credit to a judgment rendered by a court of the state of Alaska.
In 1979 the defendant, Richard Link, an Ohio resident, placed an advertisement to sell a camera in a nationally circulated flyer containing numerous individual classified advertisements of articles for trade or sale (printed in Florida), entitled “Shutterbug Ads.” The plaintiff, a resident of Alaska, read the ad and phoned the defendant in Ohio, making an offer to purchase. In May…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Afram Export Corporation, a Wisconsin Corporation v. Metallurgiki Halyps, S.A., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Lycan v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Carothers v. VogelerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- United Standard Management Corp. v. Mahoning Valley Solar Resources, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Mustang Tractor & Equipment Co. v. Sound Environmental Services, Inc.Lucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.