Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. Loomis

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1965PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert O. Brink, J.

This is a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 8) in which the defendants have moved for a judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that this court does not have jurisdiction over the person of the defendants.

The motion was argued at Special Term, and thereafter, on December 8, 1964 a hearing was held pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [c]) in accordance with this court’s request, at which time testimony was taken from Irving N. Loomis, one of the defendants, and Warren S. Schroeder, the plaintiff.

The case involves actions for breach of warranty and negligence. It was commenced by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Lewin v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Supreme Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Elizabeth Taylor v. Portland Paramount CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  2. Franklin National Bank v. KrakowDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1969
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. RichardsonNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Aurea Jewelry Creations, Inc. v. LissonaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  5. Chertok v. Ethyl Corporation of CanadaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API