Legal Opinion

Wooden v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 2011No. WD 72856PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES EDWARD WELSH, Judge.

Quinzell Wooden appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s decision that he is not eligible for unemployment benefits because his employer, The Summit, Inc., discharged him for misconduct connected with work. He claims that the Commission failed to make adequate factual findings as to whether his failure to pick up trash, which resulted in his termination, constituted misconduct connected with work. He also contends that, even if the Commission’s findings were adequate, the evidence was insufficient to support the Commission’s decision. Because the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Missouri Division of Employment Security v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. Berwin v. Lindenwood Female CollegeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Williams v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Shared Services, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Dolgencorp, Inc. v. ZatorskiMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wooden v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Barron v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Norath v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Mooneyham v. Barnz B, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. HILDA TAVENNER, Claimant-Appellant v. PRESBYTERIAN MANORS, INC., Employer-Respondent and MISSOURI DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITYMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API