Legal Opinion

Mooneyham v. Barnz B, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 12, 2011No. SD 30903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Chief Judge.

Tara Mooneyham (“claimant”) was denied unemployment benefits because she was found to have been discharged for misconduct connected with work. See §§ 288.030.1(23) & 288.050.2.1 We reverse *595because the competent, substantial evidence of record does not support the misconduct finding.2

Factual and Procedural Background

Claimant worked for Barnz B, Inc. (“employer”) for almost four years. She was told at a March 2010 performance review that her job duties would change and her pay would be reduced to $10 per hour. Sent home early to consider her job situation, Claimant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Scrivener Oil Co. v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Comeaux v. Convergys Customer Management Group, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Rush v. Kimco Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Tenge v. WASHINGTON GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Nevettie v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scott v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API