Attorney Grievance Commission v. Cherry-Mahoi
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.
The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“Petitioner” or “Bar Counsel”), acting through Bar Counsel and pursüant to Maryland Rule 16-751(a), 1 filed a petition for disciplinary or remedial action against Respondent, Ada Elizabeth Cherry-Mahoi, on September 15, 2004. The Petition alleged that Respondent, who was admitted to the Bar of this Court on December 18, 1990, violated several Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (“MRPC”), specifically, 1.1 (Competence), 2 1.3 (Diligence), 3 1.4 (Communication), 4 1.5 (Fees), 5 1.15 (Safekeeping Property), 6 1.16(d) (Declining or Terminating…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. OwrutskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. NussbaumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FoltzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.