Wright v. Compton Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUNN, J.
In June 1971, plaintiff commenced an action against the Compton Unified School District to recover compensation for legal services rendered. In its answer to the complaint defendant alleged, as an affirmative defense, that plaintiff’s claim was unenforceable because it constituted an indebtedness or liability in excess of the debt limitation set forth in California Constitution article XIII, section 40.
The parties stipulated that the action could be tried without a jury and that the court could render judgment on the basis of the pleadings and the following agreed statement of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- American Co. v. City of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- San Francisco Gas Co. v. BrickwedelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Lewis v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Grocers' Fruit Growing Union v. Kern Cty. Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- County of Shasta v. County of TrinityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- People v. BlankenshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Yong Shao Ma v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Compton Community College Federation of Teachers v. Compton Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Gateway Community Charters v. SpiessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.