Legal Opinion
County of Shasta v. County of Trinity
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 22, 1980No. Civ. 18867PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DeCRISTOFORO, J *
The dispute involved in this appeal arose in the wake of the adoption of Proposition 13 (the Jarvis-Gann initiative) in the June 1978 primary election. The measure adds article XIII A to the California Constitution and imposes limitations upon the assessment and taxing powers of state and local governments. Appellants, Trinity County et al. (referred to hereinafter collectively as Trinity County), have refused to pay Trinity County’s share of payments due from the Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District to the Shasta Joint Junior College District,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Louisiana Ex Rel. Hubert v. Mayor and Council of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Louisiana Ex Rel. Nelson v. Police Jury of St. Martin's ParishSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Pass Sch. Dist. of L.A. Cty. v. Hollywood City Sch. Dist. of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1909
- City of Redondo Beach v. Taxpayers, Property Owners, Etc., City of Redondo BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Carman v. AlvordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Goodman v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Valentine v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- City of Watsonville v. MerrillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.