Legal Opinion

Yong Shao Ma v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 2002No. A092105PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUVOLO, J.—

I

Introduction

Appellants Yong Shao Ma (Ma) and Pui Kay Chan (Chan) appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of respondent City and County of San Francisco (CCSF). Ma and Chan are the surviving husband and father, respectively, of Angelique Chan, who died from an acute asthma attack on the evening of August 27, 1998. Sometime before her death, a call was made to CCSF’s 911 medical emergency service, reporting that Ms. Chan was complaining of severe physical distress. In their subsequent civil action for damages, Ma and Chan claimed that CCSF owed a tort duty to callers…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Munoz v. City of Union CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Eastburn v. Regional Fire Protection AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Friedman v. Merck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Munoz v. City of Union CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. ePresence, Inc. v. Evolve Software, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API