Frankland v. De Broux

The inquiry here is whether, after giving the testimony the most favorable construction it will bear in appellants’ favor, there is credible evidence from which a reasonable inference can be drawn in support of the case. Boyce v. Independent Cleaners, Inc. (1932) 206 Wis. 521, 240 N. W. 132; Kortendick v. Waterford (1908), 135 Wis. 77, 115 N. W. 331; Mahar v. Montello Granite Co. (1911) 146 Wis. 46, 130 N. W. 949; Reiland v. Wisconsin Valley Electric Co. (1930) 202 Wis. 499, 233 N. W. 91. This requires an examination of the evidence.-

Appellants contend the facts show Bauman had plenty of time…