Legal Opinion

Deignan v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1958PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Appellants submit that Patricia is absolved as a matter of law from negligent management and control because she was confronted by a sudden emergency to which she had not contributed, citing Johnson v. Prideaux (1922), 176 Wis. 375, 378, 187 N. W. 207:

“. . . ‘an automobile driver, who by the negligence of another ... is suddenly placed in an emergency ... , is riot guilty of negligence if he makes such a choice as a person of ordinary prudence placed in such a position might make, even though he did not make the wisest choice.’ ”

And Frankland v. De Broux (1947), 251 Wis. 210, 217, 28 N. W.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. PrideauxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Frankland v. De BrouxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shaw v. WuttkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Baird v. CorneliusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Cook v. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Blasi v. DrafzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Schemenauer v. TRAVELERS INDEMINITY CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API