Legal Opinion

Raddant v. Tamminen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, C. J.

The first question on this appeal is: Was an emergency created solely by the negligent acts of appellant, or did Jewel Raddant act so as to contribute to that emergency? Mrs. Weiss was attempting to pass a car which was admittedly moving at the rate of 55 miles per hour. She was moving toward a hill in the road which declined in the direction she was going. Her view was thus limited so that she could not see the oncoming car until it was too late to avoid a collision. She took a chance on passing the car in front of her without being perfectly sure that she would have time to get around it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoehne v. MittelstadtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Klas v. FenskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Frankland v. De BrouxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Winter v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  2. Mlinar v. Olson Transportation Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API