Legal Opinion

Frawley v. Kittel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1949PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaRtin, J.

The question in this case is whether there is credible evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury that the defendant, Walter Kittel, was guilty of negligence as. to lookout and control which was a proximate cause of the accident. This requires a consideration of further relevant facts.

The passengers in the eastbound car operated by Kittel, were Mary Ann Hassell in the right front seat, and Rose Marie Frawley, Milton Dahm, and Freddie Greenwood, from left to right in the rear seat.

The defendant, Joseph J. Zemski, driver of the westbound car, testified that he fell asleep at or near the crest…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hoehne v. MittelstadtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Rebholz v. WettengelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Thorp v. LandsawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Grover v. ShermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Leslie v. KnudsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schoenberg v. BergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Stanek v. ColeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  3. Fisher v. GibbWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API