Boyce v. Independent Cleaners, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
A nonsuit, like many of the law’s instru-mentalities, is especially designed to save the innocent from the annoyance of meeting frivolous or empty charges. The motion for a nonsuit should be granted unless, after giving the testimony the most favorable construction it will bear in plaintiff’s favor, the court finds credible evidence from which a reasonable inference can be drawn in support of the case. Kortendick v. Waterford, 135 Wis. 77, 115 N. W. 331; Mahar v. Montello Granite Co. 146 Wis. 46, 130 N. W. 949; Reiland v. Wis. Valley Elec. Co. 202 Wis. *527499, 233 N. W. 91. Where that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gatzow v. BueningWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Topolewski v. Plankinton Packing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Hawarden v. Youghiogheny & Lehigh Coal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Christensen v. SchwartzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Kortendick v. Town of WaterfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Augustine v. Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Radue v. DillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Judevine v. Benzies-Montanye Fuel & Warehouse Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Maleki v. Fine-Lando Clinic Chartered, S.C.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Scheit v. DuffyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.