Legal Opinion

Davis v. Virges

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1905No. 5573PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered February 21, 1903, in favor of the plaintiffs and against sureties upon the defendants’ appeal bond, after the dismissal by the supreme court of an appeal from a judgment of the same court.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, C. J.

On February 21, 1903, respondents recovered a judgment for $750 and costs, against the Tacoma Railway & Power Company, George M. Shreeder and Mace O. Green, and thereafter the judgment debtors appealed to this court. Shreeder and Green did not join with the Tacoma Railway & Power Company in the appeal, but. took a separate, independent appeal. At the time the appeal was taken by Shreeder and Green, an appeal and .supersedeas bond was given by them, with A. Huth and William Virges as sureties. The bond was in substance as required by statute, except after reciting that, if the judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. O'Connor v. LighthizerWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Grunewald v. West Coast Grocery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Henry v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Duke v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Salo v. Pacific Coast Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. State Ex Rel. Tollefson v. NovakWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Davis v. HuthWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Johnston v. Seattle Taxicab & Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API