Salo v. Pacific Coast Casualty Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered June 29, 1916, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for personal injuries sustained by a passenger in a jitney bus.
1Opinion of the Court
Main, J. —
The purpose of this action was to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, Sigrid Salo, when a jitney bus, in which she was a passenger, collided with an automobile at the intersection of 23d avenue and Union street, in the city of Seattle. In the same accident, four other persons were injured, and each brought a separate action for the recovery of damages. In each case, recovery was sought against the owner and operator of the jitney bus, and the surety upon the bond required under chapter 57, Laws of 1915, p. 227 (Rem. Code, § 5562-37 *110et seq.). In each of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Denny-Renton Clay & Coal Co. v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Davis v. VirgesWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- County of Snohomish v. RuffWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Kalb-Glibert Lumber Co. v. CramWashington Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by27 opinions
- Duke v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Port of Seattle v. Department of Public ServiceWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HydeOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. PriceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.