Legal Opinion

Wiles v. Mullinax

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 26, 1969No. 6919SC13PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Britt, J.(1) Defendants assign as error the trial court’s allowing plaintiff to introduce paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 7 and 11 of defendants’ fourth further answer and defense. These paragraphs are summarized as follows: Defendants are informed and believe that after claim was made against plaintiff by Estelle Tucker (widow of the deceased employee) a hearing was set before the North Carolina Industrial Commission at Concord, N. C. Plaintiff herein, as the employer of Murray Lee Tucker, appeared at said meeting, presided over by Deputy Commissioner Shuford, on 3 December 1959. Royal Indemnity…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Warren v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Chavis v. Home Security Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. In Re the Will of CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Rudd v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Wiles v. MullinaxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Aluminum Products, Inc. v. PollardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API