Legal Opinion

American Aluminum Products, Inc. v. Pollard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1990No. 8910SC433Published

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I. Motion for New Trial

Defendants first assign as error the trial court’s denial of their motion for a new trial pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 59.

Initially, we note that judgment here was rendered in open court on 2 August 1988. At that time defendants gave oral notice of appeal. Defendants subsequently moved for a new trial on 9 August 1988 and the trial court denied the motion on 28 November 1988.

*545“For many years it has been recognized that as a general rule an appeal takes the case out of the jurisdiction of the trial court.” Wiggins v. Bunch, 280 N.C. 106, 108, 184 S.E.2d 879,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. United Laboratories, Inc. v. KuykendallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Privette v. University of North Carolina at Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API