Legal Opinion

Rudd v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1932PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Tbe plaintiff offered in evidence a paper, tbe service of wbicb bad been accepted, purporting to be a notice to tbe defendant to produce at tbe trial tbe original, or duplicate original, or standard form policy, of insurance, by'which R. L. Holmes was insured against liability for personal injury sustained by third persons and property damage arising out of tbe use, operation, and maintenance of an automobile therein described — tbe policy having been delivered to Holmes on or before 24 December, 1928. In addition, tbe plaintiff offered secondary evidence of tbe contents of tbe policy wbicb,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Will of CravenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Peeler v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Quelch v. . FutchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Ferebee v. . BerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. State v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Call v. StroudSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. State v. . DaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API