In Re the Will of Crawford
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
Upon the trial the propounder, over objection, offered in evidence the probate proceeding before the clerk, including the will. There is no question but that the probate of a will in common form before the clerk is inadmissible as evidence on an issue of devisavit vel non raised by a caveat. In re Will of Etheridge, 231 N.C. 502, 57 S.E. 2d 768; Wells v. Odum, 205 N.C. 110, 170 S.E. 145. Probate in common form is ex parte. Caveators are not before the court and hence not bound by the proceeding. In re Will of Chisman, 175 N.C. 420, 95 S.E. 769. “It is well settled that the probate of a will…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Simmons v. Davenport.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- In Re Will of ChismanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- In Re WestfeldtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Ellis v. . WellonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Ellis v. WellonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re the Will of McCauleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Bank of Varina v. SlaughterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- State v. ShumakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- In Re Will of RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- In Re Will of WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.