Legal Opinion
Permagrain Products, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 4, 1985No. 81-12-01644PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RE, Chief Judge:
The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of certain merchandise imported from Canada, and described on the customs invoice as “unfinished hardwood flooring blanks.”
The merchandise was classified by the Customs Service as “other hardwood flooring” under item 202.60 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS). Consequently, the merchandise was assessed with duty of 6.8 per centum ad valorem.
Plaintiff protests this classification and contends that the merchandise is properly classifiable under item 202.42, TSUS,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Nippon Kogaku (USA), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Chevron Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- American Bayridge Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Faus Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Permagrain Products, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Arthur J. Humphreys, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.