Legal Opinion

Jarvis Clark Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 17, 1984No. Appeal 83-1106PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

WISDOM, Senior Circuit Judge'.

The government’s petition for rehearing is denied 733 ,F.2d 873 (Fed.Cir.1984). The government’s brief on petition for rehearing is full of sound and fury,’but advances no argument that the Court did not consider in its first decision.

The government again argues that the text and legislative history of the 1980 Customs Courts Act demonstrate no intent to modify the dual burden of proof. We think it manifest that 28 U.S.C. § 2643(b) was intended to do just that. For convenience we again quote the relevant statutory language and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Arnold Pickle & Olive Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  2. Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Borlem S.A.—Empreedimentos Industriais v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  4. Phone-Mate, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  5. Ugg International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API